UN tells the world: Stop making Africa look small
A 164-to-1 UN Vote Redraws the Political Map of Cartography
Qinilo.com – For nearly five centuries, a single Flemish cartographer's solution to a sailor's compass problem has shaped how billions of people picture the planet. On Friday, the United Nations General Assembly voted 164 to 1 to urge governments, educators, international bodies, and technology firms to move away from that 16th-century design whenever relative landmass size matters. The resolution, championed by an African-led campaign backed by the African Union, marks the culmination of a decades-long push to correct what its sponsors call the "symbolic minimization" of a continent roughly 14 times the size of Greenland.
The United States was the sole dissenting vote. Six nations — Estonia, Georgia, Lithuania, Moldova, Serbia, and Ukraine — abstained. The European Union voiced its support for the measure, though the text was truncated in available reporting before its full position was recorded.
What the Resolution Actually Does — and Does Not
Crucially, the text does not outlaw the Mercator projection or mandate any single replacement. It encourages the adoption of the Equal Earth projection and other equal-area alternatives in contexts where proportional size carries meaning, and it calls for curricula that teach students the inherent limitations of flattening a sphere onto a two-dimensional surface. The distinction matters: navigation charts, where straight lines preserve constant compass bearings, remain perfectly suited to Mercator's geometry.
The Equal Earth projection, developed in 2018, preserves area ratios across the globe. On such a map, Africa occupies the vast equatorial band it genuinely spans, while Greenland shrinks to its true, modest footprint. Northern Europe and North America, long inflated by Mercator's polar exaggeration, likewise contract toward their actual proportions.
The Cartographer's Original Intent
Gerardus Mercator, a Flemish mapmaker working in the 1560s, published his projection in 1569 to solve a practical maritime problem. By ensuring that rhumb lines — paths of constant compass heading — appeared as straight lines, he gave navigators a reliable tool for plotting courses across open ocean. The trade-off was area: the farther a landmass sits from the Equator, the more its surface is stretched. Greenland, perched near the pole, balloons to a size that visually rivals Africa's, even though the African continent dwarfs it by a factor of approximately fourteen.
Despite its narrow navigational origin, Mercator became the default visual language of classrooms, newsrooms, digital mapping platforms, and official documents worldwide. The resolution argues that this ubiquity has done more than distort geometry; it has, over generations, fed an unbalanced perception of the world's regions.
A Question of History and Power
Behind the technical vocabulary lies a broader contest over whose history gets encoded in everyday imagery. Togo's foreign minister, Robert Dussey, who led negotiations on behalf of the African group, framed the vote in those terms before the chamber.
"Maps shape our understanding of the world. They guide education, nourish the imagination, and influence collective perceptions."
Dussey stressed that the initiative was not an indictment of Mercator's navigational utility, nor a bid to impose one projection on every use case.
"A fair map does not change the geography of the world, it changes how we see the world."
The resolution's language goes further than mere cartographic hygiene. It describes correcting long-standing distortions as an act of "cognitive justice and memorial reparation," language that drew sharp criticism from Washington.
Washington's Objection
The American representative dismissed the measure as part of "the much larger and more radical ideological project it belongs to," arguing that what was presented as a benign update to cartographic proportions was, in fact, a political maneuver.
"This resolution mocks the work and purpose of this institution."
The delegate singled out the resolution's references to reparations and "cognitive justice," calling comparable initiatives "barnacles on our work here and the reason this institution is losing its credibility."
Paris Pivots; Kyiv Objects
Hours before the vote, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot announced that Paris intended to abandon Mercator for its official world maps, aligning the government with the broader effort championed by the African Union. The practical consequence is striking: France itself, like the United States and Russia, will appear smaller relative to equatorial nations on maps produced under the new standard.
Ukraine, while affirming its support for correcting historical distortions affecting Africa and other parts of the Global South, raised a specific objection. Its representative warned that certain Equal Earth renderings depict Ukrainian territory currently occupied by Russia in ways that could generate ambiguity over disputed borders.
"Endorsing the projection without adequate safeguards could open a Pandora's box, allowing maps to create ambiguity over disputed territories."
Why This Matters Beyond the Map Room
The vote underscores how deeply embedded a single design choice can become in institutional habit. Textbooks, satellite-navigation interfaces, news graphics, and government atlases all inherit the visual grammar of whichever projection they adopt. Shifting that grammar — even incrementally, even only in contexts where size comparison is the point — alters the default mental model that students, policymakers, and the general public carry about continental scale.
For Africa, a continent of 54 nations spanning roughly 30 million square kilometres, the stakes are not merely academic. Decades of visual underrepresentation in the world's most ubiquitous map format have, according to the resolution's sponsors, reinforced a perception of marginality that bears no relation to the continent's actual geographic, demographic, or economic weight. The Equal Earth projection, by preserving area, removes the polar inflation that has long flattered smaller northern landmasses at the expense of equatorial ones.
The resolution's near-unanimous passage — 164 votes in favour against a single opposition — signals that the cartographic debate, simmering for decades within African diplomatic circles and academic cartography departments, has crossed into mainstream multilateral policy. What happens next will depend on whether ministries of education, mapping agencies, and the technology companies that render billions of map tiles each day translate the General Assembly's encouragement into concrete changes in the products people see every day.
Related Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
What is UN tells the world?UN tells the world is the main topic of this guide. The article explains the context, practical details, and next steps readers should understand.
Why does UN tells the world matter?UN tells the world matters because readers are looking for a useful answer, not just a short summary. Good content should match search intent and help them decide what to do next.